OPINIONS ARE POSTED DAILY BETWEEN 10:00 and 11:00 a.m. Today is: [ Saturday November 01, 2014 ] - - - - - NO OPINIONS HAVE BEEN POSTED TODAY The most recent opinions are for: [ 10/30/2014 ]  
DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office                            as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
132545U.pdf  10/30/2014  Eddie Risdal  v.  Mike Nixon
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:   13-2545
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City   
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Bowman and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. The district court erred in denying defendants' motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity on plaintiff's excessive force claims as plaintiff's unsworn telephone-hearing statements were not properly submitted under Rule 56(c), and the district court erred, as a matter of law, in relying on those statements in denying the motion for summary judgment; without the statements, the uncontradicted evidence established the force used to restrain plaintiff was objectively reasonable and did not violate his constitutional rights. Judge Kelly, dissenting.
133094P.pdf  10/30/2014  Kevin Jones  v.  Mark Frost
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:   13-3094
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
[PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Wollman and Loken, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil Rights. Plaintiff's action alleging defendants conspired to conceal evidence and deprive him of his right to a fair trial was barred by Arkansas's three-year statute of limitations on malicious prosecution claims and there were no grounds for equitable tolling.
133262U.pdf  10/30/2014  Jerry Hawkins  v.  Lt. Steven Glover
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:   13-3262
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Texarkana   
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Bye and Smith, Circuit Judges] Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. District court judgment granting plaintiff nominal damages against one defendant and dismissing the other defendants is affirmed.