DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
151966U.pdf   02/05/2016  United States  v.  Robert Mahan, Jr.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-1966
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Arnold and Smith, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. Anders case. Defendant could not challenge 
   the voluntariness of his plea for the first time in this direct appeal; 
   argument that the felon-in-possession statute is invalid under Missouri's 
   constitution because it violated the right to bear arms is patently 
   frivolous; ineffective assistance of counsel claims would not be 
   considered on direct appeal. 
  
152554U.pdf   02/05/2016  Marie Gladue  v.  Saint Francis Medical Center
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2554
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Benton, Bowman and Kelly, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Civil case - Employment discrimination. Defendant's summary judgment on 
   plaintiff's hostile-work-environment claims affirmed; no error in holding 
   plaintiff responsible for costs. 
  
152753U.pdf   02/05/2016  United States  v.  Matthew Casas
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2753
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Benton, Bowman and Kelly, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. Anders case. Defendant waived his right to 
   appeal a part of his plea agreement,and the appeal is dismissed. 
  
152874U.pdf   02/05/2016  United States  v.  Travis Eaton
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2874
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Ft. Dodge    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Arnold and Smith, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not abuse its 
   discretion by denying defendant's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 
   U.S.C. Section 3582(c)(2).