DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
132545U.pdf   10/30/2014  Eddie Risdal  v.  Mike Nixon
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-2545
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Bowman and Kelly, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. The district court erred in denying 
   defendants' motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity on 
   plaintiff's excessive force claims as plaintiff's unsworn 
   telephone-hearing statements were not properly submitted under Rule 56(c), 
   and the district court erred, as a matter of law, in relying on those 
   statements in denying the motion for summary judgment; without the 
   statements, the uncontradicted evidence established the force used to 
   restrain plaintiff was objectively reasonable and did not violate his 
   constitutional rights. Judge Kelly, dissenting. 
  
133094P.pdf   10/30/2014  Kevin Jones  v.  Mark Frost
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-3094
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock    
   [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Wollman and Loken, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Civil Rights. Plaintiff's action alleging defendants 
   conspired to conceal evidence and deprive him of his right to a fair trial 
   was barred by Arkansas's three-year statute of limitations on malicious 
   prosecution claims and there were no grounds for equitable tolling. 
  
133262U.pdf   10/30/2014  Jerry Hawkins  v.  Lt. Steven Glover
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-3262
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Texarkana    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Bye and Smith, Circuit Judges] 
   Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. District court judgment granting 
   plaintiff nominal damages against one defendant and dismissing the other 
   defendants is affirmed.