DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
161778U.pdf   02/21/2017  Dexter Duren  v.  URS Corporation
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1778
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Bowman and Kelly, Circuit 
   Civil case - Employment discrimination. Defendant's summary judgment 
   affirmed; neither the denial of an award nor a job reclassifcation 
   constituted a material adverse employment; claims never raised in the 
   district court or abandoned on appeal would not be considered. 
161807P.pdf   02/21/2017  Ramon Mendoza  v.  Jeff Davis
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1807
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha    
   [PUBLISHED] [Beam, Author, with Colloton and Gruender, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Civil rights. The agent issuing an ICE detainer had probable 
   cause to do so based on the information provided by plaintiff and official 
   files and other government records and he was entitled to qualified 
   immunity on plaintiff's Bivens claim; the county sheriff had no direct 
   participation in the alleged violations of plaintiff's civil rights and 
   was entitled to qualified immunity; the county employees involved in 
   plaintiff's detention reasonably believed plaintiff was another person 
   based on the information provided to them and were entitled to qualified 
   immunity; failure to train and supervise and municipal liability claims 
   were properly rejected as the record showed employees received training 
   and information regarding handling ICE detainers and followed the 
   information and practices; any actions they took could not be attributed 
   to a defective government practice or policy; none of defendants' actions 
   meet the standard necessary for a substantive due process violation, and 
   the conduct in question was, at most, negligent and did not rise to the 
   level of a constitutional violation; civil conspiracy claim rejected as 
   there was no constitutional violation in the case. 
163402U.pdf   02/21/2017  Rickey Holtsclaw  v.  Sandy Sanders
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3402
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Smith, Bowman and Benton, Circuit 
   Civil case - Civil Rights. Dismissal of plaintiff's pro se Section 1983 
   complaint affirmed without comment.