DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
163802U.pdf   11/14/2017  Don/McC Cook/Solo  v.  Jeffrey Stieve
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3802
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Murphy and Shepherd, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. Plaintiff demonstrated neither 
   deliberate indifference nor unconstitutional retaliation by defendant Dr. 
   Stieve, and defendant's summary judgment is affirmed without comment. 
  
163850P.pdf   11/14/2017  United States  v.  Calvin Wedington
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3850
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis    
   [PUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Murphy and Colloton, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. Under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 
   4245(d), the district court did not err in determining Wedington is in 
   need of continuing custody for treatment of his schizophrenia. 
  
163980P.pdf   11/14/2017  United States  v.  Levell Durr
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3980
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck    
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Gruender, 
   Circuit Judge] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing, Sentence imposed upon the revocation of 
   defendant's supervised release was not substantively unreasonable; as the 
   sentence was based on multiple violations and the 3553(a) factors, the 
   court did not procedurally err in varying upward. 
  
164063U.pdf   11/14/2017  James Villa  v.  United States
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-4063
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Bowman and Kelly, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Prisoner case - Habeas. The advisory guidelines are not subject to a 
   vagueness challenge under the Due Process Clause. Beckles v. United 
   States, 137 S. Ct. 886 (2017). 
  
171053U.pdf   11/14/2017  Carlos Arguello-Rodriguez  v.  Jefferson B. Sessions, III
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-1053
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Beam and Shepherd, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Petition for Review - Immigration. Substantial evidence supported the IJ 
   and BIA determinations that petitioner had failed to show past persecution 
   or a well founded fear of future persecution in Mexico on a statutorily 
   protected ground. 
  
171204U.pdf   11/14/2017  Amaida Bonilla  v.  Jefferson B. Sessions
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-1204
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Bowman and Kelly, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Petition for Review - Immigration. Petitioner has failed to raise any 
   legal or constitutional challenge to the agency finding that her removal 
   would not cause exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her 
   children; since she does not challenge this finding, the court need not 
   address her challenge to the agency's finding that she failed to establish 
   continuous physical presence, as the finding regarding hardship is, by 
   itself, sufficient to support the denial of cancellation of removal. 
  
171306U.pdf   11/14/2017  Vanessa Dundon  v.  Kyle Kirchmeier
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-1306
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Beam and Shepherd, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Civil case - Injunctions. This appeal in an action seeking to enjoin the 
   use of excessive force against demonstrators protesting the Dakota Access 
   Pipeline was not rendered moot by the completion of any portion of the 
   pipeline; the district court's order denying injunctive relief was not an 
   abuse of discretion. 
  
171405U.pdf   11/14/2017  United States  v.  James Capehart, III
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-1405
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Murphy and Shepherd, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. Anders case. Defendant's appeal waiver was 
   valid, applicable and enforceable, and this appeal is dismissed.