DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
152736U.pdf   09/26/2016  United States  v.  Dayton Heins
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-2736
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Council Bluffs    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Beam and Gruender, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. The issue of whether the district court 
   abused its discretion in revoking defendant's supervised release was 
   mooted by his release from prison; in any event, defendant admitted he 
   violated two provisions of his supervision and the revocation was not an 
   abuse of the district court's discretion. 
  
153757U.pdf   09/26/2016  United States  v.  Jeffrey Treta
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-3757
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Beam and Gruender, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court prudently considered 
   recidivism rates in child pornography cases and did not impose an 
   unreasonable sentence, considering that factor as well as the facts of the 
   offense and defendant's history and characteristics. 
  
161196U.pdf   09/26/2016  United States  v.  Altonio Graves
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1196
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Beam and Gruender, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. The court did not abuse its discretion in 
   weighing the 3553(a) factors and in giving weight to defendant's criminal 
   history; the court generously accounted for the circumstances of defendant 
   having committed bank robberies in two states by ordering that a portion 
   of his sentence be served concurrently with his sentence from the Southern 
   District of Illinois; sentence was not substantively unreasonable. 
  
161279U.pdf   09/26/2016  United States  v.  Derrick Parker
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1279
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Beam and Gruender, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. Sentence imposed upon the revocation of 
   defendant's supervised release was not substantively unreasonable. 
  
161283P.pdf   09/26/2016  United States  v.  Mario Thomas
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1283
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - El Dorado    
   [PUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Beam and Gruender, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not err in determining 
   defendant's conviction under Arkansas Code Annotated Section 
   5-13-201(a)(1) was a crime of violence for sentencing purposes. 
  
161373U.pdf   09/26/2016  United States  v.  James Bailey
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1373
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport    
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Beam and Gruender, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. No error in imposing an enhancement under 
   Guidelines Sec. 3C1.1 for obstruction of justice where defendant made a 
   false statement under penalty of perjury to prevent the Social Security 
   Administration from detecting his crime.