DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
162760U.pdf   10/11/2017  James Whitney  v.  Sergeant Morse
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-2760
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville   
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Bowman and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. Defendants were not deliberately indifferent to plaintiff's needs while he was a pre-trial detainee, and the district court's order granting defendants summary judgment is affirmed without further comment. 164040U.pdf 10/11/2017 John E. Peet v. Nancy A. Berryhill U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-4040 U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Bowman and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Social Security. The ALJ did not err in limiting the scope of proceedings to the period within the scope of the remand order; the ALJ did not err in proceeding with the hearing even though claimant was unrepresented as claimant had several notices of his right to have counsel and had been given a list of organizations to contact for legal assistance. 164281U.pdf 10/11/2017 Jorge Sanchez-Soto v. Jefferson B. Sessions U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-4281 Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Bowman and Benton, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. Petitioner offered no evidence that the two particular social groups on which he based his request for withholding of removal were viewed as socially distinct in Guatemalan society or were different from groups previously held not cognizable, and the IJ did not err in denying his request for withholding of removal; petitioner's evidence failed to show it was more likely than not he would be tortured if he returned to Guatemala, and the IJ did not err in denying CAT relief. 164385U.pdf 10/11/2017 Henry Diaz-Garcia v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-4385 Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Bowman and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. Petitioner's proposed particular social group was not cognizable and the evidence did not compel the conclusion that the gang members who beat him up did so for any other reason than to recruit him (rather than because of his religion or another protected ground); the agency did not err in denying petitioner's request for withholding of removal; denial of CAT relief affirmed. 171156U.pdf 10/11/2017 Robert Thomas v. Nancy A. Berryhill U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 17-1156 U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Benton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Social Security. Substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the ALJ's determination that claimant's depression did not significantly limit his ability to do basic work activities. 171483U.pdf 10/11/2017 Matthew Barnett v. Wendy Kelley U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 17-1483 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Batesville
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Benton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Prisoner case - Prisoner civil rights. The district court did not err in granting summary judgment prior to discovery; plaintiff's due-process claim fails because he lacks a protected liberty interest in being considered for work release; plaintiff's equal-protection claim fails because he did not identify differential treatment of similarly situated individuals; with respect to plaintiff's ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims, he failed to plead sufficient facts to support a plausible inference that he was denied consideration for work release because of his disability. 171758U.pdf 10/11/2017 United States v. Laquetta Hughes U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 17-1758 U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Waterloo
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Bowman and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Anders case. Defendant's sentence was not substantively unreasonable. 171903U.pdf 10/11/2017 United States v. Daniel Reydondo U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 17-1903 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Gruender and Benton, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Anders case. The district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence.