DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
163243U.pdf   10/06/2017  In Re: Travelers Home Ins.  v.  
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3243
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Loken and Murphy, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Civil case - Civil Procedure. Where petitioner filed a motion to transfer 
   venue from the Western District of Missouri to the Eastern District and 
   the district court denied the motion, a writ of mandamus was a proper 
   mechanism for seeking review of the order; the court has resolved the 
   underlying issue in the suit which concerned whether labor is depreciable 
   when Traveler's calculates actual cash value - see In re State Farm Fire & 
   Cas. Co, Nos. 16-3185 and 16-3562 (8th Cir. Sept. 25, 2017); in light of 
   the Circuit's disposition of the matter, the petition for a writ of 
   mandamus is granted, the district court's order is vacated and the matter 
   is remanded for further proceedings in light of the decision in In Re: 
   State Farm. 
  
163896U.pdf   10/06/2017  Bradley Landreth  v.  Nancy A. Berryhill
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3896
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Benton and Kelly, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Civil case - Social Security. The ALJ did not err in determining claimant 
   did not equal or meet a listed impairment; likewise, the ALJ's 
   determination regarding claimant's residual functional capacity was 
   supported by substantial evidence. 
  
171017P.pdf   10/06/2017  United States  v.  Antonio Minnis
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  17-1017
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Colloton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. Defendant's prior conviction for attempted 
   first-degree assault in violation of Mo. Rev. Section 565.050 is a crime 
   of violence, and the district court did not err in finding he was a career 
   offender under Guidelines Sec. 4B1.1.