DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
153322P.pdf   06/26/2017  Jeffrey Karlson  v.  Action Process Service, etc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-3322
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Riley and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Fair Labor Standards Act. The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the jury's verdict, was sufficient to support its conclusion that plaintiff was an independent contractor and not defendants' employee for Fair Labor Standards Act purposes. 162021P.pdf 06/26/2017 Aaron Eckerberg v. Inter-State Studio, etc. U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-2021 U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Gruender and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Personal Injury. The evidence was sufficient to show that plaintiff's legal domicile was the state of Florida, thereby establishing diversity of citizenship; the district court did not err in denying defendant's motion for remittitur of the $4.5 million damages award, as the injuries plaintiff sustained significantly affected his future earnings, and with both economic and non-economic damages included in the general award, the total is not "monstrous, shocking or grossly excessive." 163277P.pdf 06/26/2017 RP Golf v. CIR U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-3277 Petition for Review of an Order of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Smith and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Tax Court determination that taxpayer did not make a "qualified contribution easement" under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 170(b)(1)(E) is affirmed. 163396U.pdf 06/26/2017 United States v. Mark Banes U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-3396 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Arnold and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not extend defendant's term of imprisonment in order to enable defendant to complete a treatment program or otherwise promote his rehabilitation, and the sentence did not violate Tapia v. United States, 564 U.S. 319 (2011). 163421P.pdf 06/26/2017 Richardson Edionseri v. Jefferson B. Sessions III U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 16-3421 Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
[PUBLISHED] [Arnold, Author, with Wollman and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. Harms allegedly suffered through the actions of supernatural forces are not persecution; to the extent petitioner alleged the Nigerian government was unable or unwilling to control the devil's human agents, the evidence does not support this contention as the police regularly responded to his calls for assistance and followed regular police procedures in dealing with the situations; substantial evidence also supported the agency's determination that petitioner did not have a reasonably objective fear of future persecution by the government or someone the government was unwilling or unable to control, as the government has made progress in curbing wizard torture and this, with other evidence, demonstrates that petitioner is less likely to be persecuted today than he would have been ten years or so ago when he lived in Nigeria and was labeled a wizard.