DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
162100U.pdf   05/25/2017  Jose Doe  v.  Dave Goodman
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-2100
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam. Before Shepherd, Arnold, and Kelly, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Civil Case - civil rights. Grant of summary judgment on the basis of 
   qualified immunity and on the merits to law enforcement officials 
   following the execution of two search warrants is affirmed. Where warrant 
   authorized search of single residence associated with the IP address and 
   multi-tenants resided therein, it was not clearly established that search 
   of one of the rented rooms would violate the Fourth Amendment; warrant 
   authorizing the search of Doe's vehicle and computer was supported by 
   probable cause; and restricting Doe from vehicle for two hours did not 
   result in unlawful detention. Judge Kelly dissents. 
  
162161P.pdf   05/25/2017  United States  v.  Lazaro Soliz
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-2161
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Colloton and Beam, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal Case - sentencing. District court did not procedurally err in 
   granting sentence at low end of guidelines range after granting downward 
   variance and considering the section 3553(a) factors. The district court 
   did not abuse its discretion in sentencing, as defendant acted alone and 
   thus there were no sentencing disparities between co-conspirators and 
   disagreements with practices of other district court does not demonstrate 
   abuse of discretion. 
  
162266U.pdf   05/25/2017  Jose Valle Chacon  v.  Loretta E. Lynch
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-2266
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam. Before Gruender, Arnold, and Kelly, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Petition for Review - immigration. Substantial evidence supports the 
   denial of asylum and withholding of removal. 
  
162571U.pdf   05/25/2017  United States  v.  James Borden
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-2571
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam. Before Colloton, Bowman, and Kelly, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Criminal Case - Anders. District court did not plainly err in applying the 
   challenged sentencing enhancement or in calculating the Guideline 
   imprisonment range or impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. 
  
163427P.pdf   05/25/2017  Food Market Merchandising, Inc  v.  Scottsdale Indemnity Company
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3427
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Loken and Murphy, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil Case - diversity. Where notice of claim is required "as soon as 
   practicable, but in no event later that sixty days after the end of the 
   Policy Period," the district court's determination that no reasonable 
   factfinder could conclude that seven months notice was "as soon as 
   practicable" is affirmed. Because notice is a condition precedent to 
   coverage, a showing of prejudice is not required. The district court 
   properly found the term "as soon as practicable" to be unambiguous, and 
   properly concluded there was no waiver.