for the Eighth Circuit

153169U.pdf   03/16/2017  Yan Zhang  v.  Jefferson B. Sessions, III
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  15-3169
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Benton, Beam and Murphy, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Petition for Review - Immigration. The BIA's decision to affirm the IJ's 
   credibility findings was supported by substantial evidence, including 
   discrepancies in petitioner's testimony and evidence; petitioner failed to 
   establish past persecution on a protected ground as the isolated incident 
   of police detention he points to, while unfortunate and troubling, falls 
   short of persecution; nor did petitioner establish a well-founded and 
   objectively reasonable fear of future persecution on religious grounds if 
   he returned to China; because petitioner failed to meet the lower standard 
   for asylum relief, he necessarily failed to meet the stricter standards 
   for withholding of removal or CAT relief. 
  
161794U.pdf   03/16/2017  United States  v.  Max Bolden
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-1794
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Benton, Beam and Murphy, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. Sentence imposed upon the revocation of 
   defendant's supervised release, including five years of further 
   supervision, was not an abuse of the court's discretion and was 
   substantively reasonable. 
  
162705U.pdf   03/16/2017  United States  v.  Tyjuan Cooper
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-2705
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Riley, Chief Judge, and Gruender and 
   Kelly, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not err in imposing an 
   enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 2K2.1(b)(6) for possession of a firearm 
   in connection with another felony offense as the evidence was sufficient 
   to show defendant was involved in drug trafficking. 
  
162723P.pdf   03/16/2017  AMCO Insurance Company  v.  Judith Williams
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-2723
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Shepherd, 
   Circuit Judge] 
   Civil case - Insurance. Applying Missouri case law, the tortfeasor was not 
   an underinsured motorist, and AMCO's policy with the victims did not 
   provide additional coverage; the policy in question was not ambiguous with 
   respect to underinsured motorist coverage.