OPINIONS ARE POSTED DAILY BETWEEN 10:00 and 11:00 a.m. Today is: [ Sunday May 29, 2016 ] - - - - - NO OPINIONS HAVE BEEN POSTED TODAY The most recent opinions are for: [ 05/27/2016 ]  
DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office                            as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
151397P.pdf  05/27/2016  Michael Bull  v.  Nationwide Mutual Fire Ins.Co.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:   15-1397
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
[PUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Melloy and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Insurance. The policy's exclusion for loss caused by water below the surface of the ground applied and defeated coverage for plaintiff's loss.
152483U.pdf  05/27/2016  Savoil King  v.  Homeward Residential, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:   15-2483
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro   
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Arnold and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Unjust enrichment. The district court erred in dismissing plaintiffs' claim for unjust enrichment against their loan servicers as the allegations of the complaint showed the claim was not inconsistent with the contract at issue.
153112U.pdf  05/27/2016  United States  v.  Mario Ward
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:   15-3112
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Arnold and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a sentence two years below defendant's guidelines range and the statutory maximum.
153289U.pdf  05/27/2016  Amie Reeves  v.  Carolyn W. Colvin
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:   15-3289
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
[UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Smith, Arnold and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Social Security. District court judgment affirmed.
153371P.pdf  05/27/2016  United States  v.  David Dieguez
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:   15-3371
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln   
[PUBLISHED] [Ericksen, Author, with Gruender and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Defendant waived any argument that the district court's explanation of his sentence was inadequate by waiving, in response to the court's inquiry on this precise question, any further elaboration of the court's reasons; sentence was not substantively unreasonable.