DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
113641U.pdf   12/11/2012  Sung Chan  v.  Eric H. Holder, Jr.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-3641
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam. Before Wollman, Melloy, and
   Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
   Petition for Review - immigration. In the interest of justice, petition for
   review of denial of motion to reconsider or reopen denial of petition for
   alien relative is transferred to the United States District Court for the
   Southern District of New York.
  
113661U.pdf   12/11/2012  Painters Dist. Council No. 2  v.  Anthony's Painting
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-3661
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [UNPUBLISHED][Per Curiam. Before Bye, Gruender, and Shepherd,
   Circuit Judges]
   Civil Case - Labor. District court did not err in granting summary
   judgment to union and trusts against employer. This court will not
   consider arguments relating to admission of supplemental authority that
   were not raised in the district court, and circumstances do not warrant
   exercise of discretion to prevent miscarriage of justice. District court did
   not abuse its discretion in denying Rule 59(c)/60(b) motion. Motion for
   attorneys fees and costs are denied.
  
121002U.pdf   12/11/2012  Michael Connoy  v.  U.S. Bank, N.A.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1002
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam. Before Wollman, Melloy, and
   Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
   Civil Case - foreclosure. District court's dismissal of action is summarily
   affirmed.
  
121102U.pdf   12/11/2012  United States  v.  Terry Campie
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1102
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam. Before Chief Judge Riley, Smith, and
   Colloton, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal Case - sentence. District court did not abuse its discretion in
   imposing ten years of supervised release. Ten-year term is within
   advisory range and circumstances (his age upon completion of his
   imprisonment, his lack of prior criminal record and his education and
   employment) are not so compelling as to require fewer than ten years.
  
121136U.pdf   12/11/2012  Bituminous Casualty Corp,  v.  United HRB General Contractors
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1136
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam. Before Melloy and Benton, Circuit
   Judges, and Baker, District Judge]
   Civil Case - Diversity. Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal is granted.
  
121344P.pdf   12/11/2012  United States  v.  John Jones
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1344
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Bye and Gruender, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal Case - sentence. After remand for sentencing without career
   offender enhancement, district court did not abuse its discretion in
   imposing same sentence, representing an upward variance of 90 months
   from the advisory guideline range. District court committed no
   procedural error and sentence was not substantively unreasonable, as the
   sentence was based on the district court's careful evaluation of section
   3553(a) factors.
  
121442P.pdf   12/11/2012  United States  v.  Jeraldon Green
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1442
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Chief Judge Riley, Author, with Wollman and Melloy,
   Circuit Judges]
   Criminal Case - conviction. District court did not clearly err in failing to
   recognize and remedy appointment of attorney for witness who had
   previously represented the defendant. Defendant failed to object, per se
   rule of reversal does not apply, defendant did not show witness's interest
   was materially adverse to defendant's interest, and defendant failed to
   demonstrate any error affected substantial rights or fairness, integrity or
   public reputation of the judicial proceedings.
  
122067U.pdf   12/11/2012  Ida Pettus  v.  Elbert Harvey
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2067
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam. Before Wollman, Melloy, and
   Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
   Civil Case - employment discrimination. District court's grant of
   summary judgment on race discrimination and retaliation claims was
   proper.