Text Size:
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
111356U.pdf 12/04/2012 United States v. Eldridge Sumlin U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 11-1356 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Colloton and Benton, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Sentencing. For the court's prior opinion see U.S. v. Sumlin, 453 F. App'x 668 (8th Cir. 2012). On remand from the Supreme Court for further consideration in light of Dorsey v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 2321 (2012). Sentence vacated and case remanded to the district court for resentencing consistent with Dorsey and the Fair Sentencing Act. 121517U.pdf 12/04/2012 United States v. Marcella Scharton U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-1517 U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln [UNPUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Loken and Smith, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law. District court's questions clarified how the Social Security Administration determined whether defendant's husband was gainfully employed and the court was permitted to ask these questions under Fed. R. Evid. 614(b). 121655P.pdf 12/04/2012 United States v. John Farnell U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-1655 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Beam and Benton, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law. Officer had a reasonable suspicion that defendant was engaged in criminal activity - fleeing the scene of a bank robbery - when he stopped defendant's van; defendant gave a valid consent to the search of the van; even accepting defendant's argument that the officer's second entry and search of the van was a separate search, the search was valid as the officer had probable cause to conduct the search based on the discovery of a handgun in the van. 121793U.pdf 12/04/2012 Eric Williams v. Judith Bearden U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-1793 U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Murphy, Arnold and Smith, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - civil rights. Dismissal of Section 1983 complaint affirmed without comment. 122847U.pdf 12/04/2012 United States v. Michael Sherman U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-2847 U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Murphy, Arnold and Smith, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Sentencing. Sentence was not substantively unreasonable.