DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
121111U.pdf   11/02/2012  United States  v.  Stevon Warren
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1111
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Bye, Beam and Shepherd,
   Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - Criminal law. Evidence was sufficient to support
   defendant's convictions for interstate transportation to engage in
   prostitution and sex trafficking of a minor.
  
121296U.pdf   11/02/2012  United States  v.  Alejandro Lopez-Placencia
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1296
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Melloy and Shepherd,
   Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - Sentencing. Anders case. The district court committed
   no significant procedural error in sentencing defendant and the sentence
   imposed was substantively reasonable.
  
121426P.pdf   11/02/2012  B.A.B.  v.  The Board of Education
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1426
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Wollman and Murphy, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Civil rights. On claim that the defendant Board of
   Education negligently failed to train the nurse who gave BAB an H1-N1
   shot despite the fact that she knew BAB's parent did not consent to the
   shot, the district court did not err in dismissing the claim as plaintiff's
   allegations failed to state a claim; state law claims against the nurse were
   properly dismissed.
  
126039P.pdf   11/02/2012  Mark Turpen  v.  Norman Rouse
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-6039
   U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kressel, Author, with Saladino and Nail, Bankruptcy Judges]
   Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Missouri does not provide an exemption
   for children who are not related - either biologically or through adoption -
   to the head of the family and the bankruptcy court did not err in denying
   debtor's claim for an exemption for the three children of the unrelated
   woman living with him.