DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
113380P.pdf   10/10/2012  Roy Abshire  v.  Redland Energy Services
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-3380
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Gruender and Benton, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Fair Labor Standards Act. An employer does not violate
   the Act merely because, under a consistently-designated workweek, its
   employees earn fewer hours of overtime than they would if the workweek
   was more favorably aligned with their work schedules; employer's
   permanent workweek change did not violate Section 207(a)(1) of the Act.
  
121402P.pdf   10/10/2012  Donald Dunn  v.  Jason Aamodt
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1402
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Beam and Benton, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Property. District court did not err in finding defendants'
   short-term rental of their residential property did not violate the
   provisions of the Restrictive Covenants in their subdivision.
  
121745U.pdf   10/10/2012  United States  v.  Jamal Holmes
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1745
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Loken and Murphy,
   Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - Sentencing. Sentence imposed upon revocation of
   defendant's supervised release was not unreasonable.
  
121747U.pdf   10/10/2012  United States  v.  David Zehringer
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1747
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Melloy, Beam and Benton,
   Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - Criminal law. District court lacked jurisdiction to
   recalculate defendant's restitution order which had been entered more
   than 10 years prior to the filing of his motion to recalculate; even if
   authority existed to permit amendment at this time, the arguments in
   defendant's motion lacked merit as they contradicted the stipulations he
   made in his plea agreement.