DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
122725U.pdf   03/15/2013  United States  v.  Willie Alexander
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2725
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Gruender and
   Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not abuse its discretion under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3584 in making defendant's revocation sentence consecutive to his state sentence. 122960U.pdf 03/15/2013 United States v. Arlend Stewart U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-2960 U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Bowman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Sentencing. District court did not err in finding that defendant possessed the firearm in question in connection with another felony offense - possession of crack cocaine - as the preponderance of the evidence showed the substance was crack. 122987U.pdf 03/15/2013 United States v. Brandon Jones U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-2987 U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Bowman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Sentencing. Assuming the district court erred in resolving a factual dispute regarding a prior conviction without taking sworn testimony or requiring record evidence of the conviction, the court complied with Fed. Crim. P. Rule 32(i)(3)(B) by determining, alternatively, that the sentence would be unaffected by the conviction since defendant's Criminal History Category score remained the same without the point attributable to the conviction. 123167U.pdf 03/15/2013 United States v. Abraham Ceron-Lopez U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-3167 U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Bowman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Sentencing. District court committed no procedural error in sentencing defendant, nor did it err in departing upward based on its belief that the advisory Guidelines range did not adequately account for the vast number of fraudulent and illegally-obtained documents involved in defendant's immigration offenses; sentence was not substantively unreasonable. 123172U.pdf 03/15/2013 United States v. Kirby Johnson U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-3172 and No: 12-3173 U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Bowman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Police search did not exceed the scope of the private search performed by the property manager at defendants' apartment complex; evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for possession of crack with intent to distribute; district court did not commit procedural error at sentencing and the within-Guidelines-range sentence was not substantively unreasonable. 123394U.pdf 03/15/2013 United States v. Kenneth Perkins U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-3394 U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Bowman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Sentencing. District court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a three-year term of supervised release, and the sentence was not substantively unreasonable.