DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
122572P.pdf   03/07/2013  Shaunta Hudson  v.  United Systems of Arkansas
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2572
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Loken and Colloton, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Employment discrimination. A legally sufficient basis
   existed for a reasonable jury to determine that plaintiff had made a
   showing that she had been discriminated against on the basis of her
   gender, and the district court did not err in finding defendant was not
   entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the claim; district court did not
   err in denying defendant's motion for a remittitur as the evidence was
   sufficient to support the jury's award of $100,000 for mental anguish, and
   the award was not monstrous, shocking or grossly excessive.
  
122635U.pdf   03/07/2013  Layla Linegar  v.  Mark Lobanoff, M.D.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2635
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Bowman and Gruender, 
   Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Torts. Under Minnesota law, a medical tort claim must be
   supported by expert testimony, and the district court did not err in
   dismissing plaintiff's medical tort claims after she acknowledged that she
   did not have an expert witness available to testify at trial.
  
122887U.pdf   03/07/2013  Sarojini Daram  v.  Jeffrey Ptak, M.D., P.C.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2887
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Murphy, Smith and Colloton,
   Circuit Judges]
   Civil case. Dismissal of complaint on the basis of claim preclusion
   affirmed without comment.
  
123702U.pdf   03/07/2013  Julia Ann Briggs  v.  Wheeling Machine Product Co.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-3702
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Murphy, Smith and Colloton,
   Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Employment discrimination. District court did not err in
   dismissing the complaint as time barred as plaintiff had not filed a timely
   charge with the EEOC and had failed to provide any basis for waiver or
   equitable estoppel.