for the Eighth Circuit

121242U.pdf   01/30/2013  United States  v.  Justin Bicket
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1242
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Bye and Benton,
   Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - Criminal law. Evidence was sufficient to support
   defendant's conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm;
   district court did not abuse its discretion in limiting cross-examination on
   other DNA samples as the evidence would have been irrelevant or
   cumulative.
  
121777P.pdf   01/30/2013  Heubel Materials Handling Co  v.  Universal Underwriters Insur
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1777
                          and No:  12-1951
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Beam and Smith, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Insurance. Because no reservation of rights or conflict of
   interest entitled Heubel to select its own counsel while continuing to
   enjoy the coverage benefits of the policy issue by defendant Universal,
   Heubel breached the policy by refusing to allow Universal to control the
   defense; Universal suffered substantial prejudice from Heubel's refusal
   and Universal was justified in denying coverage based on Heubel's
   breach of the cooperation clause.
  
122437P.pdf   01/30/2013  United States  v.  Gilbert Crow Eagle, Jr.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2437
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Pierre   
   [PUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Bye and Benton, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. In a prosecution for
   sexual assault, the district court did not err in permitting the introduction
   of evidence that defendant has committed previous sexual assaults on
   family members, as the evidence was relevant due to the similarity of the
   assaults and was more probative than prejudicial; no error in refusing to
   permit defendant to introduce evidence that three of the witnesses had
   allegedly made false sexual assault allegations in the past; sentence was
   not substantively unreasonable.
  
126050P.pdf   01/30/2013  Raymond Kelley  v.  Centennial Bank
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-6050
   U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [PUBLISHED] [Schermer, Author, with Federman and Saladino,
   Bankruptcy Judges]
   Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Bankruptcy court acted within its
   discretion when it interpreted its prior order and the Chapter 11 plan to
   mean that debtors were required to convey the real property in question to
   the bank.