Text Size:
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
113110U.pdf 01/02/2013 United States v. Agustin Nunez-Reynoso U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 11-3110 U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Melloy and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Anders case. Evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine; district court's drug calculation was supported by the record; search issue was not raised in the district court and would not be considered on appeal; denial of motion for appointment of counsel was not an abuse of discretion. 121449U.pdf 01/02/2013 United States v. Rena Kennedy U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-1449 U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Melloy and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Sentencing. Denial of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3582(c)(2) motion affirmed. 121897P.pdf 01/02/2013 Dennis Siegel v. Connecticut General Life Ins. U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-1897 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Benton and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - ERISA. District court correctly reviewed the plan administrator's decision under an abuse-of-discretion standard; plan administrator did not abuse its discretion in terminating plaintiff's benefits as there was substantial evidence to support the determination that he was able to work and was not totally disabled. 122041P.pdf 01/02/2013 RaShina Young v. Michael J. Astrue U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-2041 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Wollman and Melloy, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Social Security. Denial of benefits affirmed; ALJ properly developed the record and made sufficient findings; the record had sufficient evidence to determine that claimant retained the ability to perform her past relevant work despite her manipulative limitations. Judge Melloy, dissenting. 122675U.pdf 01/02/2013 Kenneth Harris v. T. Outlaw U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-2675 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Wollman, Melloy and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Prisoner case - habeas. Dismissal of Sec. 2241 application affirmed without comment.